theory and victims of human spontaneous combustion

according to my promise in my previous postI will review all the theories and the victims of spontaneous human combustionat the start of the famous victims 

Of the 200 reports received within a period of 350 years, here's some of the victims are most often mentioned in the writings of the SHC. 


On 9 April 1744, Grace Pett 60-year-old who lives in Ipswich, England, was found by his daughter in a condition such as "a piece of wood is eaten away by the fire with no flames visible presence in his body." Clothes are hung near the bodies of victims had no visible signs of burning. 


In 1951, a 67-year-old widow named Mary Reeser was at his home in Florida. At that time a neighbor who wanted to visit front door of Mary felt the heat. When he and several other neighbors rushed in, they found Mary sitting in a chair in tragic circumstances. Head and his body was burned to the ground and leaving little left of the spine and legs. 


On May 18, 1957, Anna Martin, 68, a native of Pennsylvania found to have been reduced to ashes with only a small part of the stomach and a pair of shoes. The medical officer estimated Anna Martin burned by the fire with temperatures up to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, equivalent to a temperature flame used in the process of cremation.

On December 5, 1966, a 92-year-old grandfather named Dr. J Irving Bentley also from Pennsylvania found dead on fire. Dr. Bentley's body was burned in his bathroom with his legs, leaving only one slice. 

Witness Events 

Imagine how horrible it when we see someone we know on fire in front of our eyes. This also happens on several occasions in the past SHC. 

In 1938, a 22-year-old woman named Phyllis Newcombe had just finished dancing and preparing to leave the Shire Hall in Chelmsford, England. While he was walking down the stairs, he suddenly saw his clothes on fire for no reason. He immediately ran into the ballroom, yelling for help. A moment later he fell unconscious. Some people are panicking in hand immediately extinguish the fire that licks Ms Newcombe. But unfortunately, life is not hopeless. The coroner who investigated the case found no indication of a cigarette or other ignition source could lead to fire. 

In 1982, a handicapped woman named Jean Lucille Saffin was sitting with his 82-year-old in Edmonton, London. According to the story of his father, suddenly flames appear out of nowhere and licks her body. He sees the upper body of Jean began to burn. He and his son managed to extinguish the fire, but Jean's life is saved. 

Another story on this one. On September 1985, a young woman named Debbie Clark was walking back to his home when suddenly he saw a blue flame that occasionally looks up at him. Debbie is not aware of this dangerous situation immediately tell her mother that panic is soon extinguished with water. 

Something similar happened in 1980 when Susan Motteshead who was in her kitchen to see him suddenly enveloped by flames. But the fire is suddenly disappeared before he could burn his body further. 

Surprisingly, according to witnesses who survived, they did not feel any burning sensation or pain. This testimony adds to the mystery of this phenomenon levels. Does this mean that the victims were killed without feeling pain? 

Theories 

There are many theories that attempt to explain the cause of this strange event. These theories were initially proposed by looking at patterns that existed at the victims.Indeed, from the SHC 200 reports received, not all but most of the victims of SHC has some similarities:

They generally are the elderly.Have a disability or limitation of motion of the body. Women who are found in Brevard County, Florida, which I mentioned in the first paragraph also has difficulty moving even though he could walk.Smokers and drinkersPeople who are lonely or living alone for a long time. 
So by looking at these patterns, some researchers are trying to provide a scientific explanation of the causes of this phenomenon.These theories are: 


Alcohol 
Most victims of SHC are alcoholics. There are some claims that alcoholics can achieve a level of alcohol in the blood which can make it on fire. But this theory is considered to be unfounded because ethanol can be burned only if the concentration is greater than 23%.This theory is implausible because if the man has a concentration of 1% only in the blood, then surely that person will die. 


Wick Effect, or the effects of axis
This theory states that the human body when touched with fire, cigarettes can cause fires to burn the body. According to the researchers as well, the fat in the human body serves as incendiary substance. While the victims clothing or hair serves as a wick. While the body fat melt from the heat, it soaks clothing and create a "fuse" burns slowly. This is why their bodies are burned while the surrounding objects. 


When the theory was put forward, people ask, how to explain the pieces left foot or the hand of the victim's body? The answer is the temperature level at the victim's body, still according to the researchers, when in a sitting position, the upper body of the victim to be hotter than his feet. The analogy is like when you light a match. The fire will burn his head and slowly come down. But usually the fire will die before it burns away all that leaves little matchstick matchstick bottom.This theory is plausible enough, but the problem is when the wick of the human body can create this effect?This question can not be answered until today. 


Static Electricity
Another theory says that the type of clothing the victim may have triggered the onset of static electricity. Someone walking on the carpet to create an electric current and voltage enough to create sparks of fire.But this theory is also refuted, since although the electrical voltage generated is high, the stored energy is very low, typically less than 1 joule. It's not enough to create a fire. 


Psychosomatic 
Most of the victims were found dead are those who live alone or lonely. So according to some researchers, psychosomatic processes that occur may have caused a chain reaction with nitrogen in the body to process them and cause a chain reaction of mitochondrial explosions. This theory is also considered to be far-fetched 

Gas and electricity in the human body
From among all the theories put forward, maybe this is the most plausible theory. We know that the human body contains electricity and in the human body there is also a gas that can light a fire. An example is methane gas in the intestines. This theory says SHC can occur when methane is mixed with electricity in the body.Once again, a plausible theory. But the question is, when electricity and methane in the body can create a fire. This question is not answered again. 


Forfeited due to falling a sleep
 And now, here's the simplest theory. According to some people, cause burning of the victim's body can be inferred from the characteristics of victims, as I mentioned above. The victims were found generally being smoked or drunk and alone. Victims also are generally elderly or have disabilities such as constraints on the body.

So when they are asleep, the cigarette held by their fall, burned carpet and eventually spread to his body. Because they have constraints on the motion of her body, then they are not able to save themselves to death on the spot. Very simple is not it?But this theory is considered to be ignoring the fact that in the discovery of the victim's body, objects around even a bed or a chair was not found completely charred. This suggests that the source of the fire seemed to originate from within the body of the victim, not from outside. 


Planned crime 
And finally, here's the simplest theory among the simplest. This theory may be put forward by researchers who are lazy to think. According to them, death is due to crime victims. Their bodies were charred from the criminals attempt to remove traces. Lame .... So this theory ignores the fact 

that so many have never glimpsed by credible researchers.I hope this post helpful to you allkeep the spirit alive for the rest of this live.!!.:D